- #How to use mono framework on mac how to#
- #How to use mono framework on mac mac os x#
- #How to use mono framework on mac android#
- #How to use mono framework on mac windows#
Because Mono is basically a free, open-source implementation of Microsoft’s. The two application communicate using Intent and Broadcast Intent.In the eleven years since Mono first appeared, the Linux community has regarded it with suspicion. Xamarin is used do display datas and the "compagnon app" handle all the IO.
#How to use mono framework on mac android#
The solution that has been used by some customers is to write a "compagnon app" that is written in Java and that use our Android library. We are working on a solution but it will only work for TCP connection but it will not support USB connection. Has anyone managed to get this working with Xamarin on Android? Moreover, programming paradigms on handheld devices are a bit different. We don't have any discrete version of the low level library on Android nor iOS. Monday,january 13,2014 Actually, this is not that simple. So, if you support mono - is there a chance to get your nice devices running on xamarin (= mono for ios & android)? that would be super awesome! 3 - martinm (Yocto-Team) Thanks for providing this - you guys rock! 2 - nilse You will be able to control a Yoctopuce relay, but until Mono fixes this issue, reading temperature from a Yoctopuce sensor is off the mark. Mono does not support the HardFloat architecture (HF) yet, so floating point calculus doesn't work very well. One last word: if you planned to use Mono on a Raspberry Pi, you might be a bit disappointed. To be completely honest, we had to make some minor modifications on the high-level API to make it work with Mono. Yocto-Temperature example program compiled with Mono on Linux So, to make the C# Yoctopuce API work with the OS of your choice, you need to retrieve the dynamic library for your OS (you can find it in the C++ API), copy the contents of the configuration file above in a file named executable_nfig and that's it.
#How to use mono framework on mac how to#
Luckily, it looks like this has been taken care of :-) Mono can use a little configuration file describing how to match a DLL with an equivalent dynamic library for the others operating systems. To make it simple, we need to tell Mono to load the library matching the operating system instead of yapi.dll. Obviously, the difficulty is to do the same with other operating systems. So Mono does seem to be compatible with C#.
For instance, if we want to test the Yocto-Temperature demo program, we only need to copy main.cs, yocto_api.cs, yocto_temperature.cs et yapi.dll in a folder, type gmcs *.cs and that's it. It's quite easy to check if the Yoctopuce API works with Mono on Windows.
#How to use mono framework on mac windows#
The Yoctopuce library for C# is distributed with the yapi.dll library only, which makes sense since (until now) the C# API was targeted for Windows only. The Yoctopuce low level API is available as a dynamic library The low-level API is written in C, and is available in multiple formats: source files, pre-compiled libraries, static or dynamic. No fancy system calls are made in the high-level API, so the odds are it will work on any platform. The high-level API is always written using only the target language, which is C# in our case. and the low-level API which handles the communications with the hardware. The Yoctopuce API is made of two layers: the high-level API, which handles device "abstract" features such as Temperature, Voltage, Relay etc.
#How to use mono framework on mac mac os x#
So, can we make the C# Yoctopuce library work on Linux or Mac OS X ? Well, there is a point: applications compiled with Mono can run on Windows, as well as Linux and Mac OS X. "What's the point?" you may ask, since Microsoft gives C#.
Mono is an open-source implementation of C# and it is compatible with C#. We didn't have such plans, however we promised to have a look at it. Some time ago, someone asked us if we had planned a Yoctopuce library for the Mono framework.
0 kommentar(er)
